Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus fluorouracil to paclitaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer.

نویسندگان

  • Ricardo Hitt
  • Antonio López-Pousa
  • Javier Martínez-Trufero
  • Vicente Escrig
  • Joan Carles
  • Alfredo Rizo
  • Dolores Isla
  • M Eugenia Vega
  • Juan L Martí
  • Francisco Lobo
  • Pedro Pastor
  • Vicente Valentí
  • Joaquín Belón
  • Miguel A Sánchez
  • Carlos Chaib
  • Cinta Pallarés
  • Antonio Antón
  • Andrés Cervantes
  • Luis Paz-Ares
  • Hernán Cortés-Funes
چکیده

PURPOSE To compare the antitumor activity and toxicity of the two induction chemotherapy treatments of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (FU; PCF) versus standard cisplatin and FU (CF), both followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT), in locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligibility criteria included biopsy-proven, previously untreated, stage III or IV locally advanced HNC. Patients received either CF (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 plus FU 1000 [corrected] mg/m2 continuous infusion on days 1 through 5) or PCF (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 2, and FU 500 mg/m2 continuous infusion on days 2 through 6); both regimens were administered for three cycles every 21 days. Patients with complete response (CR) or partial response of greater than 80% in primary tumor received additional CRT (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43 plus 70 Gy). RESULTS A total of 382 eligible patients were randomly assigned to CF (n = 193) or PCF (n = 189). The CR rate was 14% in the CF arm v 33% in the PCF arm (P < .001). Median time to treatment failure was 12 months in the CF arm compared with 20 months in the PCF arm (log-rank test, P = .006; Tarone-Ware, P = .003). PCF patients had a trend to longer overall survival (OS; 37 months in CF arm v 43 months in PCF arm; log-rank test, P = .06; Tarone-Ware, P = .03). This difference was more evident in patients with unresectable disease (OS: 26 months in CF arm v 36 months in PCF arm; log-rank test, P = .04; Tarone-Ware, P = .03). CF patients had a higher occurrence of grade 2 to 4 mucositis than PCF patients (53% v 16%, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSION Induction chemotherapy with PCF was better tolerated and resulted in a higher CR rate than CF. However, new trials that compare induction chemotherapy plus CRT versus CRT alone are needed to better define the role of neoadjuvant treatment.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Cost utility of docetaxel as induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND Trial TAX 324 showed that induction chemotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) compared with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF) followed by chemoradiation increases survival and time to progression in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS A Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of induction chemotherapy with doceta...

متن کامل

Paradigm shift in the treatment of head and neck cancer: the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy is an integral component of the management of patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, though the optimal use of chemotherapy remains to be defined. The combination of a platinum agent and 5-fluorouracil has been used as the standard neoadjuvant treatment and has been shown to permit organ preservation in operable patients and improve long-term survival outcomes in oper...

متن کامل

Sequential chemoradiation in locally advanced head and neck cancer after induction chemotherapy: an induction chemotherapy schedule more suited to a limited resource setting

BACKGROUND In our experience, induction docetaxel, platinum, and fluorouracil (TPF) chemotherapy and sequential chemoradiation in locally advanced head and neck cancer lowers compliance owing to their considerable toxicity. Most of our head and neck cancer patients have locally advanced disease at presentation. Physicians frequently prefer paclitaxel-cisplatin induction chemotherapy instead, be...

متن کامل

Empowering induction therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Induction therapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has emerged as an option for the treatment of patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. In this setting, the most studied induction regimen is docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF). However, the role of induction therapy remains to be fully validated by studies comparing TPF followed by ...

متن کامل

Induction chemotherapy with cetuximab, carboplatin and paclitaxel for the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Although controversy exists in the management of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN), clinicians often use induction chemotherapy for treatment of the most advanced cases. One promising regimen combines weekly cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading dose followed by 250 mg/m2) with carboplatin (AUC of 2) and paclitaxel (90 mg/m2). We retrospectively evaluated patients ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

دوره 23 34  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005